https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.2218380120 https://imgur.com/eoL9uBW (機器翻譯,略譯稿)_ 在之前的試驗中,用木頭製成的晶體管只能調節離子傳輸。當離子耗盡時,晶體管停止工 作。然而,來至瑞典林雪坪的研究人員開發的晶體管可以持續工作並調節電流而不會惡化。 研究人員使用輕木來製造他們的晶體管,因為所涉及的技術需要一種結構均勻的無紋木材 。他們去除了木質素,只留下長的纖維素纖維,其通道位於木質素所在的位置。 然後,這些通道被稱為 PEDOT:PSS 的導電塑料或聚合物填充,從而形成導電的木質材料 。伊薩克·恩奎斯特。 研究人員用它來製造木質晶體管,並可以證明它能夠調節電流並在選定的輸出水平上提供 連續功能。它還可以打開和關閉電源,儘管有一定的延遲——關閉電源大約需要一秒鐘; 上,大約五秒鐘。 電子設備監管 可能的應用可能包括調節電子設備,這是林雪坪大學另一個強大的研究領域。晶體管溝道 如此之大的一個優點是它可能比普通有機晶體管承受更高的電流,這對於某些未來應用可 能很重要。 Electrical current modulation in wood electrochemical transistor Van Chinh Tran https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0122-4914, Gabriella G. Mastantuoni, Marzieh Zabihipour, +4, and Isak Engquist [email protected] Info & Affiliations Edited by Peter Fratzl, Max-Planck-Institut fur Kolloid und Grenzflachenforschung, Potsdam, Germany; received October 31, 2022; accepted March 1, 2023 by Editorial Board Member Joanna Aizenberg April 24, 2023 https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2218380120 Significance Abstract 1. Results and Discussion 2. Conclusions 3. Experimental Section 4. Characterization Significance The orthotropic 3D microstructure has recently promoted wood as a template for applications in wood-based energy and electronic devices. Different varieties of electroconductive wood are widely reported; however, modulating the wood’s electrical conductivity without changing its chemical composition has not been done and remains challenging. In this work, we present an approach to preparing conductive wood (CW), in which the electrical conductivity can be modulated using an external potential. This has resulted in a transistor where all three terminals are made of conductive wood and which can be operated continuously at the selected conductivity without being limited by, e.g., saturation effects. We expect this device and concept will be a stepping stone for the development of wood-based electrical components. 意義 正交各向異性 3D 微結構最近將木材作為模板推廣到木基能源和電子設備中。不同品種的 導電木被廣泛報導;然而,在不改變其化學成分的情況下調節木材的導電性尚未完成,並 且仍然具有挑戰性。在這項工作中,我們提出了一種製備導電木材 (CW) 的方法,其中導 電率可以使用外部電位進行調製。這導致晶體管的所有三個端子均由導電木材製成,並且 可以在選定的導電率下連續工作,而不受例如飽和效應的限制。我們預計該設備和概念將 成為開發木質電子元件的墊腳石。 Abstract The nature of mass transport in plants has recently inspired the development of low-cost and sustainable wood-based electronics. Herein, we report a wood electrochemical transistor (WECT) where all three electrodes are fully made of conductive wood (CW). The CW is prepared using a two-step strategy of wood delignification followed by wood amalgamation with a mixed electron-ion conducting polymer, poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene)–polystyrene sulfonate (PEDOT:PSS). The modified wood has an electrical conductivity of up to 69 Sm1 induced by the formation of PEDOT:PSS microstructures inside the wood 3D scaffold. CW is then used to fabricate the WECT, which is capable of modulating an electrical current in a porous and thick transistor channel (1 mm) with an on/off ratio of 50. The device shows a good response to gate voltage modulation and exhibits dynamic switching properties similar to those of an organic electrochemical transistor. This wood-based device and the proposed working principle demonstrate the possibility to incorporate active electronic functionality into the wood, suggesting different types of bio-based electronic devices. Sign up for PNAS alerts. 抽象的 植物中質量運輸的性質最近激發了低成本和可持續的木基電子產品的發展。在此,我們報 告了一種木材電化學晶體管 (WECT),其中所有三個電極都完全由導電木材 (CW) 製成。 CW 是使用木材脫木素的兩步策略製備的,然後將木材與混合電子離子導電聚合物聚( 3,4-乙烯二氧噻吩)- 聚苯乙烯磺酸鹽(PEDOT:PSS)混合。改性木材的導電率高達 69 Sm -1由 PEDOT:PSS 微結構在木材 3D 支架內的形成引起。然後使用 CW 製造 WECT,它 能夠在開/關比為 50 的多孔厚晶體管溝道 (1 mm) 中調製電流。該器件對柵極電壓調製 具有良好的響應並表現出動態類似於有機電化學晶體管的開關特性。這種基於木材的設備 和擬議的工作原理證明了將活性電子功能整合到木材中的可能性,暗示了不同類型的生物 基電子設備。 Get alerts for new articles, or get an alert when an article is cited. As we step into the era of green technologies, there will be an increasing distinction between complex, nanoscale electronics on one hand and simple, large-size or large-area electronics on the other hand, the latter with special functionalities like biosensing, biointegration, biodegradability, etc. Bio-based materials will be the underpinning for the development of these functionalities. During the last decades, cellulose, lignin, conducting polymers, and other organic or bio-based materials have emerged as potential templates or active components in various electrical devices (1, 2). Among these materials, wood stands out when it comes to materials that have the potential for ion transport and regulation (3). Several studies have shown that the unique three-dimensional (3D) microstructures of wood lumina are ideally designed for mass transport in the electrodes of electrochemical devices (1–4). As a result, wood has been carbonized or functionalized with conductive materials for applications in supercapacitors, batteries, and electrochromic screens (2–6). After removing lignin, the open pathways generated along the wood fibers have been shown to provide promising ion transport channels in nanofluidic devices (7). Besides that, wood was also explored in other electrical systems such as triboelectric nanogenerators and electrical magnetic shielding (8, 9). These achievements indicate that wood has a huge potential for energy and electronic technology. Wood is orthotropic, and the directionality can provide advantages for organic transistor performance. However, among many reported devices using a wood template, there is, to the best of our knowledge, yet no report of an electrical transistor made of wood or even of electronically induced modulation of conductivity in wood-based conductors. In order to transform wood to be an active component in a conventional transistor [semiconductor transistor or organic electrochemical transistor (OECT)], tunable electrical conduction is required. The conductivity can be induced by either wood carbonization or wood modification with conducting polymers such as polyaniline, polypyrrole, or poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene) –polystyrenesulfonate (PEDOT:PSS) (5, 10, 11). However, modulation of the conductivity of carbon conductors is not possible by electronic or electrochemical measures, which rules out carbonized wood as a transistor channel material. This leaves wood modified with conducting polymers, which will be the material system of choice in the present study. Earlier attempts for “wood-based transistors” include studies focused on utilizing wood and its derivatives as a nonconductive substrate(11) for templating a conventional transistor. In this direction, cellulose paper is a common choice as it has good flexibility and in some cases also high transparency (11, 12) Cellulose fibers also show potential as a structural component in the electrolyte of an electrolyte gate transistor (12). Although cellulose has been used for silicon-containing transistors (13), transistors not based on silicon technology could in the future reduce electronic waste and be biodegradable. In a recent attempt, Li et al. reported a wood-based membrane that could regulate ion transport through modulation of an external voltage (7). For this purpose, the authors have coated a gate electrode layer of silver metal on the wood surface and applied the working principle of a gating transistor for regulating the ion movement in the membrane. This results in a kind of ionic transistor, where the authors have proved that ionic current can be regulated at the nanoscale of the wood scaffold. Such a device has interesting potential but will also be limited by the need to transfer between electrical current and ionic current at the electrodes. The anticipated buildup of ionic charge or electrochemical reaction products at the interfaces will inhibit the possibility to operate the device in a steady state for longer periods of time. For the prolonged operation of a transistor, it is required to rely upon modulation of electrical conduction (7). Therefore, we need an approach that might utilize the wood ionic conductivity but also includes sufficient and tunable electrical conduction in wood for the actual transistor channel. Building on recent progress in creating PEDOT:PSS-based conductive wood (CW) (10), the principle of operation for OECTs should be a suitable candidate that could provide such tunability. The OECT builds upon a transistor channel that is electrically conductive and that can be electrochemically modulated using ionic transport between the transistor channel and a gate electrode (14, 15). Since both these transport mechanisms can be realized within a wood template, a fully wood-based OECT should be possible to construct. The device is not expected to have high performance compared to conventional transistors as, in this work, the primary focus is to prove the hypothesis that electrical conductivity of the CW can be modulated by using an external potential. The result of this attempt is a wood transistor, in which all electrodes are made of CW. We believe this device concept will be a good example for encouraging the use of earth-abundant and sustainable resources in specific electrical applications. As shown in Fig. 1, the wood electrochemical transistor (WECT) was made from three pieces of CW. The CW was prepared using a two-step strategy of wood delignification and wood amalgamation with PEDOT:PSS (Fig. 1A and SI Appendix, Fig. S1). Hardwood balsa was selected owing to its high strength, low density, and high permeability, as well as its relatively homogeneous structure with less difference between earlywood and latewood regions compared to softwood (10, 16). In a preliminary test, we observed that balsa performed better than birch or ash in preparing high–CW electrodes (SI Appendix, Fig. S2). The conducting polymer was selected due to its excellent tunable electrical conductivity shown in numerous examples to provide a successful OECT channel (14, 17, 18) for, e.g., neuromorphic signaling and chemical sensing applications (14). The preparation method enables the formation of a beneficial microstructure of PEDOT:PSS in the wood scaffold (Fig. 1A). This microstructure not only provides electrical conductivity but also leaves room to utilize the wood 3D architecture for ionic transport (17). The CW, after that, was used to construct a WECT with an approach that is adopted from the fabrication of a double-gate OECT. Fig. 1. The schematic diagrams of (A) conductive wood preparation and (B) the wood electrochemical transistor fabrication processes. (C) From Left to Right: Front view photograph of a WECT, front view of the WECT configuration, and section of a wood fiber (conceptual view of transistor’s channel zoom-in) showing PEDOT:PSS-coated cell wall and electrolyte-transporting lumen. The assembly of a WECT is explained in Fig. 1B, where two pieces of CW (longitudinal × tangential × radial = 30 mm × 5 mm × 1 mm) were used as the bottom and the top gates (denoted as WECT-Gate). Another piece of CW (longitudinal × tangential × radial = 30 mm × 2 mm× 1 mm) was used as the transistor channel (WECT-Channel), while a cellulose/polyester lab tissue and a gel–electrolyte mixture were used as separator and electrolyte, respectively. The final WECT transistor is configured as a double-gate OECT, in which the main operation process (reduction/oxidation of the conductive polymer) happens at the microscopic scale in the lumina that form the transistor channel, Fig. 1C. 1. Results and Discussion To be employed as an active component in a transistor, the wood must have sufficient electrical conductivity. In some studies of wood coated with conducting polymers, it has been found that wood pretreatment methods including wood delignification can enhance the conductivity (6, 10, 19, 20). In this work, the balsa wood was delignified before being impregnated with the PEDOT:PSS suspension. The effect of wood delignification on the CW conductivity was examined by varying the wood delignification time from 0.0 (native wood) to 10.0 h, with results shown in Fig. 2A. We see that the CW-5.0h has the highest conductivity (69.0 ± 9.0 Sm), while the CW-Native shows the lowest value of 3.5 ± 1.0 Sm. In native balsa wood, liquid transport occurs mainly in the lumina of vessels. With the removal of lignin, wood is expected to gain a higher porosity in the cell walls, and the pits in the cell walls are open (21), which makes the lumina of fibers and parenchyma cells available to transport PEDOT:PSS suspension (22). In addition, diffusion pathways are also opened up in the middle lamella and cell wall corners in the delignified wood (DW) (23). As a result, the fiber lumina, which are the dominating structures in balsa wood, can be coated with PEDOT:PSS. The improved PEDOT:PSS diffusion results in a higher electrical conductivity in the wood. However, when the delignification time is longer than 5 h, we discovered that the wood fiber cells collapse as the softened cell walls fall onto each other, causing a “ compacting of the cellular structure.” This is evident in a reduced sample thickness in the DW-7.5 h and DW-10.0 h samples (SI Appendix, Table S1). The collapsing hinders efficient polymer diffusion in the structure (24), thus leading to a drop in the conductivities from 69 ± 9.0 Sm of CW-5.0h to 17.0 ± 5.0 Sm of CW-7.5 h. There is a slight increase to 24.0 ± 8.0 Sm1 for CW-10.0 h, but we judge this to be due to natural sample variations, and we focus on the large difference compared to the CW-5.0h sample. Based on these results and differently from other reported studies (24, 25), we found that there is in fact an optimum delignification time. This is due to an optimum lignin content resulting in an optimum level of sample integrity. Accordingly, we selected 5.0h as the optimal delignification duration, and the corresponding CW (CW-5.0h) was used for the fabrication of the WECT. The WECT-Channel and WECT-Gate were made of CW-5.0h in sizes of 30 mm × 2 mm × 1 mm (longitudinal × tangential × radial) and 30 mm × 5 mm × 1 mm (longitudinal × tangential × radial), respectively. Although having a bigger sheet area, the WECT-Gate has a lower conductivity (30.0 ± 4.0 Sm) than the WECT-Channel (69.0 ± 9.0 Sm). This probably relates to the poorer access of PEDOT:PSS to the interior parts of the larger wood piece, which has a 2.5 times larger cross-section. One plausible reason for this is that the initial PEDOT:PSS adsorption in the outer parts of the sample may partially block PEDOT:PSS diffusion into the inner parts of the sample. There could also be a delignification gradient contributing in the same way, but we believe this to be less plausible since the good permeability of the balsa wood should ensure homogeneous delignification on the 1–radial mm scale. However, we note there is a potential for improvement in future works, where the effects of the samples’ geometry, the delignification gradient, and the polymer infiltration gradient should be studied (26). Fig. 2. (A) The conductivity of CW samples fabricated using different delignification times (Inset: four-point probe measurement setup). (B) Cyclic voltammetry of the WECT-Channel and WECT-Gate samples. (C) Lignin content of Native and DW-5.0h. (D) Illustration of the ionic conductivity measurement setup. (E and F) are the cross-sectional images of CW-Native and CW-5.0h samples, respectively. (E, I) and (F, I) in turn are the cross-sectional SEM images taken at the middle of supercritically point-dried CW-Native and CW-5.0h samples. (E, II) and (E, III) are the EDX elemental mapping of oxygen and sulfur in the corresponding SEM images of CW-Native. (F, II) and (F, III) are the EDX elemental mapping of the oxygen and sulfur in the corresponding SEM image of CW-5.0h. (G and H) are the SAXS patterns of DW-5.0h and CW-5.0h, respectively. (I) The analyzing results of 1D SAXS spectra of DW-5.0h and CW-5.0h (Inset: the calculated figures of DW-5.0h and CW-5.0h). In addition to the electrical conductivity, the electrochemical properties including charge storage capacitance and ionic conductivity are important for understanding the applicability of CW as active electrodes (Gate and Channel) in an OECT. While the device operates, the 3D structure of CW is expected to facilitate a sufficient charge accumulation, which in turn will play a key role in switching the current passing through the CW-based device channel (14). As shown in Fig. 2B, both the WECT-Gate and the WECT-Channel show good capacitive behavior with their CV curves assuming a slightly deviated rectangular shape. The deviation is most probably caused by the redox activity of small amounts of native lignin, remaining in the DW (DW-5.0h), and therefore also present in the CW-5.0h sample (10). The lignin content was determined using the TAPPI T222 om-02 method and amounts to 7.1 ± 0.1 wt% which is significantly lower than the 24.9 ± 0.1 wt% in the native wood (Fig. 2C). Both the WECT-Gate and the WECT-Channel show good capacitances of 55.0 ± 5.0 mF and 31.0 ± 4.0 mF, respectively, at the scan rate of 20 mV/s (see the specific capacitances in the SI Appendix). The higher capacitance of WECT-Gate is a consequence of its larger size (2.5 times the volume of WECT-Channel). For the operation of OECTs, it is advantageous if the gate electrode has a larger capacitance than the transistor channel(26–28). As an additional observation, we note that for other electrochemical devices including supercapacitors, the capacitance results suggest the CW-5.0h as a potentially useful material (10). Along with the electrodes’ capacitances, the ionic conductivity of the WECT-Channel was also studied to understand its capability for ion-mediated electrochemical conductivity regulation when an external voltage is applied. By using the measurement setup shown in Fig. 2D, the recorded ionic resistance of the WECT-Channel (or CW-5.0h sample) is lower than that of DW-5.0h. This implies that PEDOT:PSS has played an important role in lowering the ionic resistance, which in turn means an increase in the ionic conductivity within the CW scaffold. More detailed results (SI Appendix, Fig. S3) and further discussion are presented in the SI Appendix. Structural and morphological characterization was performed to map and understand the wood’s morphology and PEDOT:PSS distribution and is presented in Fig. 2 E and F. By comparing CW-5.0h with CW-Native, we observed a clear distinction in their appearance and microstructure. As seen in Fig. 2 E and F, where cross-sections from the middle of each sample are shown, CW-5.0h appears dark blue throughout its thickness, while the cross-section of CW-Native reveals its native light brown color. This indicates that PEDOT:PSS has penetrated the entire DW structure but was not able to access the inner parts of the native (lignified) wood. Accordingly, at a microscopic scale as investigated by scanning electron microscopy (SEM), there is no trace of PEDOT:PSS in the cross-section of CW-Native (Fig. 2 E, I and III). In contrast, a PEDOT:PSS layer was seen in the fibers’ lumens (Fig. 2 F, I and SI Appendix, Fig. S4) and vessels’ lumens (SI Appendix, Fig. S5) of the CW-5.0h. This observation was further confirmed by Energy-dispersive X-ray analysis (EDX) elemental mapping images, in which sulfur was mostly observed in the wood lumen (Fig. 2 F, III). It should be noted that the PEDOT:PSS thin film in Fig. 2F was visualized by applying supercritical point drying instead of air-drying (SI Appendix, Fig. S4) as the liquid CO2 causes detachment of the polymer from the wood cell wall, making it clearly visible. In the pristine samples used in WECTs, the PEDOT:PSS film only coats the inner surface of the lumens (10), leaving the central section open for electrolyte transport. A similar coating phenomenon is expected to happen at the ray cells, contributing to transverse electrical transport and helping to create 3D electrical interconnection in the wood structure. With the observed microstructure thus formed, conceptually illustrated in Fig. 1A, PEDOT:PSS is expected to promote both the electron and ion transport through the 3D structure of CW-5.0h and in the WECT-Channel. In addition to the structure observed in SEM images, the small-angle X-ray scattering (SAXS) measurements shown in Fig. 2 present another insight into the distribution of PEDOT:PSS in the wood cell wall of CW-5.0h. The two-dimensional SAXS patterns of DW-5.0h and CW-5.0h are presented in Fig. 2 G and H). Anisotropic streaks were observed, but they only show small differences between the two samples. We further analyzed the one-dimensional (1D) data (Fig. 2I) to determine the correlation length, which means the center-to-center distance of the cellulose fibrils. Our calculation suggests that CW-5.0h has a slightly larger correlation length (29) than that of DW-5.0h (.0 ± 0.10 nm compared to .55 ± 0.15 nm) which could be an indication of penetration of PEDOT:PSS polymer chains in between the CW-5.0h wood fibers. A control measurement indicates that DMSO only has a minor contribution to this effect (cf. SI Appendix, Fig. S6). Although we are unable to quantify the amount of PEDOT:PSS inside the wood cell wall, this result suggests that some of the polymer is localized there; however, the amount should be small compared to the amount covering the cell wall. The presence also has some effects on the wood fibers’ arrangement, which was studied by wide-angle X-ray scattering (WAXS) and presented in SI Appendix, Fig. S7. The CW-5.0h sample has a smaller Herman’s orientation factor of the 200 crystal plane compared to DW-5.0h, which means the alignment of cellulose fibrils is disturbed, probably as a result of the partial impregnation with PEDOT:PSS. To further investigate the interaction between wood fibers and PEDOT:PSS, ATR-FTIR measurements were carried out for both CW-5.0h and DW-5.0h (SI Appendix, Fig. S8). The discussion on FTIR results (SI Appendix) suggests that PEDOT:PSS has interactions with the wood fibers, which facilitated the amalgamation of these components in the composite of CW-5.0h (30–32). Finally, mechanical properties (tensile strength and Young’s modulus) were measured for native, delignified (DW-5.0h), and CW (CW-5.0h) and reveal that the CW is similar in tensile strength and stiffness to the original balsa wood (cf. SI Appendix, Fig. S9). Taking all the collected evidence of electrical/electrochemical and structural properties into account, CW-5.0h was selected as a good candidate for forming electrodes for the wood transistor. 1.1. WECT. OECTs can be constructed with a single gate electrode or with double gates on either side of the transistor channel, as shown schematically in SI Appendix, Fig. S10 A and B, respectively. A double-gate configuration is beneficial when the transistor channel dimensions are large since it provides better and faster access for ion transport to all parts of the transistor channel. Here, for a WECT device with a 1-mm-thick channel, the double-gate structure would thus be advantageous. This is experimentally proven by comparing the switching performance of both configurations (cf. SI Appendix, Fig. S10 C and D). In view of this result, double-gate transistors were selected as the standard configuration for further investigations. As illustrated in Fig. 1B, a double-gate WECT is structured with the two gate electrodes positioned on the top and bottom sides of the transistor channel. Both the WECT-Gate electrodes and the WECT-Channel are made from 1-mm-thick CW-5.0h. Although 1 mm is much thicker than the ordinary thickness of a conventional PEDOT:PSS-based OECT [less than 1 μm (26, 27, 33)], still the device operates like an ordinary p-type OECT. The current passing through the WECT-Channel is defined as the drain–source current (ID). At zero gate voltage (VG), the transistor channel is open, and the transistor is ON, whereas by applying a gate voltage of 6.0 V, the channel becomes fully reduced, and the transistor is in the OFF state. Fig. 3B shows the transfer curves of the device in which the ON/OFF [ID(VG = 0)/ID(VG = 6.0 V)] current modulation reaches 1.7 orders of magnitude (50 times) for the forward sweep. In comparison with the ON/OFF ratio (hundreds to 105) of conventional PEDOT:PSS-based OECTs (14, 26, 33), the ratio of 50 is small but reasonable for a transistor with a combination of high electrode thickness and limited conductivity. In the same figure, it is observed that the transistor is switched off when VG reaches .5 V. The switching process is repeatable, which is shown in three consecutive switching runs presented in SI Appendix, Fig. S11. Fig. 3. Wood electrochemical transistor (WECT). (A) The speculated operation mechanism with a focus on part of a single wood fiber with the cell wall and lumen, (B) the transfer curve, (C) the output curves at different gate voltages, and (D) the dynamic switching characteristics at the frequency of 100 mHz. (Note: Each measurement was carried out on different devices.) A tentative operation mechanism at a microscopic level of the WECT is illustrated in Fig. 3A which is based on the switching performance and the WECT-Channel’s morphology observed in Figs. 1C and 2. A section of one wood fiber was selected to describe the working mechanism as it could represent the current modulation principle in the entire WECT-Channel (10). Before applying any potential to the gate electrodes (VG = 0 V), the WECT is in its ON state. Upon applying VG > 0, the WECT is gradually switched to the OFF state due to the electrolyte cations being driven out from the electrolyte toward the wood cell wall surface where PEDOT:PSS is mainly localized and held at negative potential. Here, an electrochemical reaction takes place where the cations compensate the counter anions (PSS, and the PEDOT+ is reduced to its nonconductive form PEDOT0 (15). As a result, the conductivity of the WECT-Channel is decreased. Output measurements are carried out to provide additional information about the performance of WECTs. Here, the drain–source voltage (VD) was swept from 0 to .0 V, while VG was increased in steps from 0 to 6.0 V. In Fig. 3C, the obtained ID–VD curves are shown. At VG = 0 V and VG = 1 V, we see that ID increases linearly with increasing VD and reaches a plateau at around VD = .5 V. After that, ID undergoes a slight decrease when the VD level is increased up to .0 V. The decrease is probably related to either a slight reduction of PEDOT:PSS at such a high voltage range or a small current leakage between the drain and the gate. In the output curves where VG is stepped to values higher than .0 V, the transistor is in the OFF mode, and such behavior is not observed. This is fully in agreement with the characteristics of ordinary OECTs. Although the WECT is expected to be slow, we also examined the dynamic switching capability of the device. In dynamic switching measurements, a function generator was sourcing VG as a square wave switching between 0 and 5.0 V at 100 mHz, while a constant VD of .0 V was applied. From the graph shown in Fig. 3D, we see that repeated dynamic switching is fully possible, although not fast. The main part of the OFF switching happens in around 1 s, which has to be considered as good under the circumstances (a 1-mm-thick transistor channel). The ON switching is slower and is not fully completed in 5 s, which is probably the reason why we see a decreasing ON/OFF ratio as the measurement in Fig. 3D progresses. For full ON/OFF dynamics, a lower frequency than 100 mHz would have to be used. With these dynamic switching properties, the WECT is not suitable for conventional electronic circuits but is probably an interesting candidate for wood-integrated applications ranging from electrochromic displays to simple logic circuits responding to sensor input. 2. Conclusions A transistor made of CW was successfully demonstrated. This result proves that it is possible to modulate the electrical conductivity of the electroactive wood by applying an external voltage. The WECT operates according to the same principle as a double-gate OECT, where the two gates and the transistor channel are made of delignified wood, made conductive (69 Sm) by the formation of a PEDOT:PSS layer in the lumina of the wood structure, in particular the fiber lumina. The current modulation occurs through electrochemical oxidation/reduction of PEDOT, with a measured ON/OFF ratio of up to 50 times. Although the device performance is poorer than the common PEDOT:PSS-based OECT, the WECT proves the principle and shows that there is a possibility to transform wood into a functional transistor by utilizing its oriented and hierarchical 3D structure, thereby introducing the possibility to control and regulate the electronic current in CW. We also believe there are possibilities for improvement by either optimizing the conductivity of wood or manipulating the device configuration. Since the mechanical stability of the transistor electrodes is as good as the original balsa wood, strong and self-supporting devices could be readily constructed. In view of the large interest in exploratory research concerning bioelectronics, bio-based electronics, and plant electronics, this device and its working principle might be a stepping stone toward different applications in those fields. 3. Experimental Section 3.1. Materials. Balsa (Ochroma pyramidale) veneers with an oven-dried density of ~0.22 g cm3 were purchased from Material AB (Sweden). Sodium chlorite (NaClO2, 80%), sodium chloride (NaCl, 99%), and dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO, 99%) were received from Sigma Aldrich. PEDOT:PSS (Clevios PH1000, water suspension with % solid content) was purchased from Heraeus, Germany. Carbon fibers, paraffin wax, silver paste, and carbon paste were purchased from Sigma Aldrich and used as received. Blue gel (250 g) was purchased from Cefar-Complex, Sweden. 3.2. Wood Delignification. Balsa wood veneers were cut in the size of 30 mm × 10 mm × 1 mm (longitudinal × tangential × radial). The veneers were delignified at 80 ° C in a NaClO2 (1.0 wt%) solution in acetate buffer for different reaction times: 2.5 h, 5.0 h, 7.5 h, or 10.0 h. The obtained DW samples were correspondingly named DW-2.5h, DW-5.0h, DW-7.5h, and DW-10.0h. 3.3. CW Preparation. The DW samples were dried under an ambient atmosphere and cut into smaller pieces. Samples with dimensions of 30 mm × 2 mm × 1 mm (longitudinal × tangential × radial) were used to prepare the CW-based transistor channel, while samples having a dimension of 30 mm × 5 mm × 1 mm (longitudinal × tangential × radial) were used to prepare the CW–based gate of the WECT. These DW pieces were thereafter impregnated in a PEDOT:PSS suspension (100 g of PEDOT:PSS suspension mixed with 6 g of DMSO) before being oven-dried at 75 °C to achieve the CW (see SI Appendix, Fig. S1 for a visual diagram). The final CW products were obtained after mechanically removing all the aggregated polymer layers on the surface of the dried samples. Corresponding with the DWs, the obtained CWs were named CW-2.5h, CW-5.0h, CW-7.5h, and CW-10.0h, respectively. The PEDOT:PSS-coated native wood (CW-Native) was prepared in a similar approach, in which native wood was cut in a specific size before being impregnated in the same PEDOT:PSS suspension to achieve the CW. All CWs used as the WECT-Channel and the WECT-Gate were dried and stored in a controlled environment before being used for the device fabrication and measurement. 3.4. WECT Fabrication. The fabrication of a double-gate WECT is presented in Fig. 1B, where the two gate electrodes are set perpendicularly to the channel electrode. One gate is on the top surface and the other one is placed under the bottom surface of the transistor channel. The channel and gates are separated by a cellulose-based tissue paper before dropping the electrolyte mixture on the crossing area of the electrodes (Fig. 1B). The electrolyte is prepared by mixing 2 mL blue gel (Blågel, Cefar-Complex) with 1 mL NaCl (1 M) and kept for 2 weeks before use. 4. Characterization 4.1. Morphology and Chemical Composition. SEM/EDX: The morphology of the wood samples was analyzed by field emission SEM (Hitachi S-4800, Japan) at a low acceleration voltage of 1 kV. The samples were microtomed, dried either in ambient conditions or under supercritical CO2, and coated with a platinum/palladium conductive layer using a sputter coater (Cressington 208HR, UK). EDX was performed at an acceleration voltage of 6 kV with an Oxford Instruments, X-MAX N 80, UK. Lignin and Monosaccharides Content: Klason lignin content was determined by acid hydrolysis according to the TAPPI T222 om-02 method. The samples were analyzed in duplicates. Quantification of the neutral sugars was performed on Dionex ICS-3000 high-performance ion-exchange chromatography (Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc.) after acid hydrolysis. The samples were analyzed in duplicates, and anhydrous factors were used for the monosaccharides (0.88 for xylose and arabinose and 0.90 for glucose, mannose, and galactose). Meier’s correlations were used to calculate the weight percentage of cellulose and hemicellulose. Leaching experiments were carried out for the WECT-Gate and WECT-Channel by soaking the CW samples in deionized water for 4 d. The results indicate no significant leaching and are presented in the Supporting Information (SI Appendix, Fig. S12). 4.2. Conductivity Measurement. The CW was glued on top of 4 chromium/gold electrodes by carbon paste, and the resistance was measured using a 4-probe technique. A Keithley 2400 source meter was used to supply the current to the two outer electrodes and to measure the voltage between the two inner electrodes. Based on the obtained resistance, the electrical conductivity (σ) of CW samples is calculated using the following equation (10): σ=1ρ=LRA, [1] where R is the obtained resistance, L is the distance between the two inner electrodes, and A is the cross-sectional area of the specimen. The sheet resistance of CW samples was calculated using the following equation: Rs=1σt, [2] where Rs is the sheet resistance, and t is the thickness of the sample. 4.3. Electrochemical Measurement. The CW electrode for electrochemical measurement was prepared following the same procedure as in our previous work. The CW is first connected to carbon fibers using carbon paste before wrapping a part of the carbon fiber with paraffin wax and Kapton tape, respectively. The electrochemical measurement was performed in a three-electrode system configuration using a potentiostat/galvanostat (by BioLogic, SP-200) coupled to a computer. The capacitance of samples was calculated using the formula (34): C=1vΔV∫ V2V1idV=A2×k×ΔV where i is the charge/discharge current (A), A is the integral area of the CV curve, k is the scan rate (mV/s), and ΔV is the working potential of the discharge process. 4.4. Wood OECT Characterization. Transfer (drain current vs. gate voltage), output (drain current vs. drain voltage), and dynamic switching (drain current vs. time) measurements were conducted using a semiconductor parameter analyzer (HP/Agilent 4155B) and a function generator (Agilent 33120 A). 4.5. SAXS and WAXS Measurements. SAXS and WAXS measurements were performed on a point-collimated Anton Paar’s SAXS point 2.0 system equipped with a Cu Kα radiation source (wavelength 1.5418 Å and beam size of ~500 μm) and an Eiger R 1M detector with 75 × 75 μm pixel size (at RISE, Sweden). The sample-to-detector distance was set to 576 mm and 111 mm for SAXS and WAXS, respectively. The exposure time of each measurement is 10 min, and they were performed at room temperature with a beam path pressure of about 1 to 2 mbar. The data reduction was performed by using SAXS analysis software (Anton Paar, Graz, Austria). Please refer to the additional SAXS measurement, which was carried out at the CERMAV-CNRS (France), in the SI Appendix. -- ※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 125.228.64.147 (臺灣) ※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/Gossiping/M.1682873438.A.E89.html
superswide: 嗯嗯跟我想的一樣 39.9.166.162 05/01 00:51
Ayanami5566: 幹太扯 跟我想得一樣 49.216.41.122 05/01 00:51
xpsecret: 有點炫炮 123.194.9.157 05/01 00:51
dayend: 其實早有植物電燈 電器了喔 已上市 61.224.5.49 05/01 00:51
a94037501: 我只用真空管 42.75.84.242 05/01 00:51
dayend: 這資訊不是新聞了~ 61.224.5.49 05/01 00:52
zz8826319: 真的跟我想的一樣 122.118.98.25 05/01 00:52
s81048112: 恩恩 了解了 厲害耶 1.174.200.84 05/01 00:52
Tattoo: 燒起來 122.117.57.49 05/01 00:53
sarsenwen: 嗯嗯跟我想差不多180.217.132.195 05/01 00:53
tacojosh: 仔細想想真得是這樣 71.95.191.4 05/01 00:53
johnhmj: 等到台雞雞做出來再說好嗎? 101.12.43.228 05/01 00:53
abcd5566: 太屌了 可以用森林做大型處理器了118.231.177.239 05/01 00:53
gremon131: 跟我有好的差不多 1.173.210.16 05/01 00:54
nges10310: 跟我夢到的一樣 223.137.104.5 05/01 00:54
King5566: 喔喔想不到我的理論居然被他們先完成了 1.168.96.162 05/01 00:54
SDFSDF: 拿來當功率元件 散熱差起火繼續供能 1.175.101.89 05/01 00:54
GGFACE: 有夠雞肋的發明== 180.47.33.149 05/01 00:54
chimeptt: 閱 218.166.73.90 05/01 00:54
CHEAT1069: 現在才知道喔 我小學在公園時就(ry 36.232.56.137 05/01 00:55
sorrywow: 所以你幾奈米 42.76.66.254 05/01 00:55
llgod: 跟植物肉原理差不多 223.138.63.191 05/01 00:55
cmcmisgod: 慘了比我早先發表 1.200.51.198 05/01 00:55
cccwahaha: 原本要走繼電器或降壓的可以直接走? 36.226.101.23 05/01 00:55
cccwahaha: 所以是讓設備成本降低的意思嗎 36.226.101.23 05/01 00:55
whiteegg: 喔 等到可以商業化量產了再叫我 111.83.19.184 05/01 00:57
gigu5498: 哇好酷114.140.114.115 05/01 00:58
coolrgin: 哦哦我早知道了 1.200.42.235 05/01 00:58
Dinenger: 跟我想得差不多 被他搶先了 106.64.1.72 05/01 00:58
garcia: 終於可以手刻了 可喜可賀 1.170.141.63 05/01 00:59
fishouse: 我以前有想過 但當時太忙沒空做 42.73.164.185 05/01 00:59
ivorysoap: 嗯 跟我想的一樣 竟然實作出來了 27.51.96.233 05/01 01:00
shenmue1001: 可以量產的那一天記得叫我 27.52.129.125 05/01 01:00
ev331: 我理盲 講人話 114.24.208.208 05/01 01:01
GoodmanYY: 不能量產有屁用118.169.149.161 05/01 01:02
STAV72: 簡單來說是把木材用藥劑洗過再鍍上邏輯閘 125.228.64.147 05/01 01:03
g70245: 滿酷的 42.79.181.255 05/01 01:03
good5755: 大小?用木板做感覺體積就很大 42.72.238.221 05/01 01:03
good5755: 真空管:當我死人? 42.72.238.221 05/01 01:03
mirac1e: 開關要五秒鐘 這根本跟垃圾沒兩樣180.217.233.216 05/01 01:04
mirac1e: 而且木材根本是絕緣體 doping也沒用180.217.233.216 05/01 01:04
mirac1e: 做這種東西根本浪費時間 笑死180.217.233.216 05/01 01:04
XXXaBg: 感覺有點酷 36.228.234.196 05/01 01:06
andy199113: 火燒起來就完了 36.227.13.239 05/01 01:07
Melmetal: 想不到有什麼優點…. 123.0.194.179 05/01 01:07
chanel1259: 從小我媽說我是木頭,看來要出頭了 123.240.245.85 05/01 01:08
sa511394: 過熱會燒起來嗎 114.27.6.188 05/01 01:10
SulaA: 成本 體積 111.243.36.105 05/01 01:11
EFERO: 滿地的矽不用 特地去砍樹來做??? 36.239.254.149 05/01 01:13
astrophy: 目前看不到有什麼潛力,先完善碳基電晶 39.9.205.63 05/01 01:14
hinajian: 所以傳統半導體的開關是幾秒?(奈秒?)111.255.143.160 05/01 01:14
astrophy: 體比較要緊 39.9.205.63 05/01 01:14
wupeter09: 這是能有什麼優點 除了弄個論文以外180.217.235.147 05/01 01:14
RaiGend0519: 都要塞填充物了,代表可以用木頭以 36.233.221.187 05/01 01:15
RaiGend0519: 外的玩意做載體 36.233.221.187 05/01 01:15
abasqoo: 講人話 27.51.57.247 05/01 01:20
vow70: 能量產商用再說,以前也一堆技術號稱多強啊 207.244.71.81 05/01 01:21
a36991069: 還在實驗室而已 能量產再說182.233.137.216 05/01 01:22
yas73528: 我就說吧 木頭不是只有拿來生火而已 101.9.174.245 05/01 01:24
ikenaka: 嗯嗯 跟我想的差不多 1.174.207.88 05/01 01:24
JJJZZs: 效能/價格沒比較好就是玩具而已 218.173.84.132 05/01 01:24
molsmopuim: http://i.imgur.com/bUfrB4C.jpg 1.200.133.112 05/01 01:26
MaBumblerQQ: 哦哦還OK啦 42.79.159.163 05/01 01:27
tactics2100: 適合拿來聽古典樂嗎? 182.234.210.69 05/01 01:30
tactics2100: 會不會出木頭管擴大機? 182.234.210.69 05/01 01:31
newyanew: 好險我國中英文還不錯 這篇文章內容跟 61.223.98.65 05/01 01:34
newyanew: 我想的差不多 61.223.98.65 05/01 01:35
user048288ef: 快推,我看的懂 114.136.157.12 05/01 01:35
danielpupu20: 台積電大利空 118.160.90.185 05/01 01:35
danielpupu20: 台積電大利空 118.160.90.185 05/01 01:35
greenpeter: 台積電要派出專利戰隊出來了嗎 27.52.38.181 05/01 01:36
twmacaron: 產矽的新竹要變沙漠了123.192.179.147 05/01 01:37
snow0214: 不能讓別人知道我不懂 先點頭再說 180.217.141.14 05/01 01:38
sunnyyoung: 一二三 木頭人 101.12.44.204 05/01 01:41
sawe53: 可惜我忘記申請專利了125.229.239.231 05/01 01:42
Lionvjm95: 嗯嗯 幫我把我想說的打成文章 辛苦了 223.137.37.29 05/01 01:45
robinnibor: 三小。一堆英文 42.75.36.164 05/01 01:45
alex00089: PPLS?220.138.106.101 05/01 01:49
st2913sbck: 石紀元? 118.168.0.25 05/01 01:51
immosha: 應該要拿其他不助燃的東西試試 39.15.64.11 05/01 01:56
alex00089: 其實跟木頭一點關係都沒有220.138.106.101 05/01 01:56
kurtsgm: 滿酷的 但99.99%是無用的研究 36.231.191.157 05/01 01:56
whathefuc: 呃…有啥應用? 42.73.120.76 05/01 01:57
ufo15526368: 剛看完,覺得還好而已 49.217.238.128 05/01 01:59
RiverMan1: 剛看完,覺得還好而已 223.138.32.203 05/01 02:01
wayhowhown: 我小學上廁所時就想到了101.137.110.190 05/01 02:14
foxher: 這算鬧板了吧?那麼長的英文給誰看125.228.145.113 05/01 02:35
kayak5566: 誇張 當耗材玩也不是這樣 203.217.122.78 05/01 02:39
outzumin: 有機半導體20年前就紅過了 換個噱頭? 70.112.26.186 05/01 02:39
c24253994: 整座森林都是我的處理器,真棒 219.71.40.105 05/01 02:41
wei09955104: 新世紀打火石 218.35.222.152 05/01 02:43
imhan705: 有啥優點嗎 122.99.24.67 05/01 02:52
z635066: 在微管束中塞導電塑料算木頭材質? 61.223.215.91 05/01 03:03
selfhu: 需要砍樹嗎? 1.169.214.6 05/01 03:06
tony890415: S.S多少 27.242.132.248 05/01 03:13
kai2573: 樹有比矽多嗎 61.58.190.11 05/01 03:14
wayne121212: 看起來只是拿木頭當骨架而已,核心 101.10.10.27 05/01 03:17
wayne121212: 還是普通的OFET啊 101.10.10.27 05/01 03:17
wayne121212: 哪有什麼革命性的變革 101.10.10.27 05/01 03:18
EugeneSue: 有什麼屌用 172.58.29.31 05/01 03:36
zerothomas8: 先看看可以活多久 27.240.161.249 05/01 03:39
EfiwymsiAros: 嗯嗯跟我想的 靠北一堆英文是殺小 107.77.205.95 05/01 04:00
smallpig02: 還好而已 61.223.252.152 05/01 04:32
ting0509: 環保材質可以賣更貴 而且保固一到一定壞 49.159.150.146 05/01 04:43
ting0509: xD 49.159.150.146 05/01 04:43
gunfighter: 飛機敢用嗎223.141.133.101 05/01 04:53
herculus6502: 矽基變碳基,便宜223.136.246.222 05/01 04:55
ee8iqp7x: 複製.pdf的paper段落跑掉,改好再貼吧 218.164.66.84 05/01 05:23
fir191938: 剛看完 還好而已 223.137.175.55 05/01 05:25
GyroZep: 菸黨:嗯又可以圈錢了 203.79.180.153 05/01 05:32
ideal5566: 感覺很像假的 36.227.110.228 05/01 05:35
RanceTsai: 太長 118.167.81.104 05/01 05:54
icespring: 嗯嗯 跟我想的一樣 42.72.184.62 05/01 05:55
hsupohsiang: I am Groot. 116.89.142.38 05/01 05:59
ryan0222: https://youtu.be/Gr1XzISc6JQ 1.200.67.67 05/01 06:03
ryan0222: 就跟紙火鍋一樣,耍噱頭,嚐鮮有趣爽一次 1.200.67.67 05/01 06:03
ryan0222: 就可以了 1.200.67.67 05/01 06:03
InvincibleK: 沒屁用,用這個會被35主管當成神經病 58.89.13.27 05/01 06:15
esp0122: 嗯嗯 我就說吧 219.69.21.148 05/01 06:16
aburabbit: 熱起來,錫都會脫焊了,木頭不會燒起 116.89.134.16 05/01 06:18
aburabbit: 來嗎= = 116.89.134.16 05/01 06:18
b7278622: Silicon還是屌打啦 環保價值就不好說了140.114.237.108 05/01 06:27
c88tm: 抽象的? 111.241.213.63 05/01 06:28
organ63521: 我早就知道了,只是我不想紅而已 133.106.132.89 05/01 06:46
gamesame7711: 結果發現奈米碳管辦到了 42.77.59.33 05/01 06:48
Mesa5566: 喔 所以螞蟻吃嗎?118.231.216.220 05/01 06:50
kentyeh: 以後晶片用種的? 42.77.35.190 05/01 06:51
Freeven: 好屌 180.217.34.90 05/01 07:02
mdkn35: 你貼這麼多誰看得懂啊 111.82.14.89 05/01 07:11
Dean997: 沒錯,我也是這麼認為 116.89.137.105 05/01 07:23
newlie: 結論是不是應該寫:整個地球是一個晶體腦? 116.89.129.226 05/01 07:24
newlie: 因為所有物品都能傳輸電子,樹木泥土水... 116.89.129.226 05/01 07:25
picass0607: 我晚上才夢到 42.73.10.227 05/01 08:32
iamhemry: 和我想的差不多 106.64.97.211 05/01 08:37
enskyzuso: 這篇我居然有一點點看得懂 42.77.61.235 05/01 08:42
d38485678: 看不懂啦 123.193.131.95 05/01 08:45
panda816: 好的 跟朕所想的一樣 42.77.61.229 05/01 09:35
Wenerrix: 我完全看不懂,噓115.165.194.217 05/01 09:37
neglect: 推一下,晚點看 36.225.134.96 05/01 09:38
Jazz9: 嗯, 沒錯, 那你怎麼看? 60.249.212.157 05/01 09:39
rancilio: 以後晶圓可以用種出來嗎? 180.217.32.62 05/01 09:54
Addidas: 成本靠北貴吧 不能用仿木材料或鍍膜就好?150.117.226.131 05/01 10:08
cosmo7897: 文章這樣貼 那大家都來隨便找paper貼 42.75.204.106 05/01 10:37
cosmo7897: 一貼洗貼文 42.75.204.106 05/01 10:37
Mood10207: 推專業 119.77.140.157 05/01 10:38
z900215ro: 洗p幣啊? 36.228.152.32 05/01 10:45
xixixxiixxii: 還不是靠填充的塑膠 27.52.70.102 05/01 10:50
f26724309: 劣退 36.227.104.244 05/01 10:52
z19880215: 還好而已 223.137.36.117 05/01 11:30
jason4571: 跟我國小想的差不多 125.228.70.222 05/01 11:34
isolove19: 跟我想的一樣 111.82.248.61 05/01 12:57
kenlin0105: 嗯嗯 跟我想的一樣 58.115.18.8 05/01 13:01
ThomasTFS80: 真×電木 114.25.139.163 05/01 14:05
cp296633: 現在去當木工學徒還來得及嗎220.136.202.101 05/01 14:54
bigtien6292: 這樣貼誰會看 亂發一通111.249.136.201 05/01 16:03
CrazyBug: 關閉要一秒鐘沒什麼實用價值吧180.217.114.179 05/01 17:40
tozz: 隨便複製貼上就可以洗文章了484 49.215.45.148 05/01 17:42
shenyi9185: 1秒延遲…5秒斷電…拿來當電燈開關都 1.200.170.210 05/01 18:47
shenyi9185: 被嫌到爆 1.200.170.210 05/01 18:47
octopuso1c: 林業起飛XD 49.217.192.67 05/01 19:07
r98192: 嗯嗯 果然跟我想的差不多 1.165.97.166 05/01 22:09
Juder: 瓦屋 111.83.80.104 05/01 23:27
hank850503: 這跟我想的一樣 可惡 192.102.209.45 05/02 02:50
windwater14: 直接貼paper?就是有機半導體運用, 223.141.170.20 05/02 08:51
windwater14: 二十年前是玩2D長成3D,這篇是給3D 223.141.170.20 05/02 08:51
windwater14: 立體框架去填導電部分,而且還是用P 223.141.170.20 05/02 08:51
windwater14: EDOT:PSS這萬用導電高分子材料。 223.141.170.20 05/02 08:51

💬 八卦 Gossiping 版:熱門文章

💬 八卦 Gossiping 版:更多文章